planetf1.com

It is currently Fri Oct 19, 2018 7:27 pm

All times are UTC


Forum rules


Please read the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2018 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 1:20 am
Posts: 636
sandman1347 wrote:
Johnson wrote:
I agree with everything in the video and its a good one, but one thing.

They could have easily got VB 3rd place by pitting him between laps 21-26. Kimi pitted on lap 21. Bottas was 1 second behind Max all of those laps and would have easily undercut him. Verstappen pitted on lap 27.

They left him out to hold up Kimi and by doing so knew they also gave VB a very good chance to get 3rd with a tyre offset. But its BS that they did everything to guarantee VB 3rd, if that was true he would have pitted laps 22-26. It was great team work, they should just tell it as it is instead of glossing over "we decided early to go long with Bottas" is BS.

You're missing the nuance of the situation. If they came out into the pit lane for Bottas during the window you're referring to, Red Bull would have sent Max's crew out into the pit lane immediately to react. They would not have given Bottas the undercut. It would have basically been exactly the same as the Hamilton/Raikkonen situation.

So why did they try it with Hamilton? They could have at least tried it. The earlier Verstappen pitted, the better it was for Bottas too as it would have meant an even larger tyre off set. Bottas was obviously quicker. If Max's tyres were 5 laps older at the end of the race Bottas may have passed him actually on track (not that it mattered in the end)

A side note to this, the WCC winners choose if they want first or last pit stop - why don't Mercedes choose the garage furthest from the entry. That way your mechanics can come out after your driver has entered the pits so can't be countered in that way.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2018 6:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 8:48 pm
Posts: 2906
Location: UK
Zoue wrote:
sandman1347 wrote:
Zoue wrote:
JN23 wrote:
bonecrasher wrote:
What a steal from Hamilton and Mercedes to extend both championship leads in Monza, and this time didn’t even need rain. But there are no tracks left on the calendar that scream Mercedes. Perhaps Suzuka and COTA. Either way it’s gonna be difficult to win the championships against the faster Ferrari which has no weak track at all. Still gonna be thrilling to watch Hamilton attempt to pull it off.


Hamilton was superb all weekend, where does his drive on Sunday rank amongst his best?

Interesting to see what happens at Singapore, on the face of it after recent years it will be another 'damage limitation' but Merc and Hamilton are doing a good job of winning those recently.

The more I think about it, the more I think this was a really good performance by Hamilton. He constantly harassed Kimi and never gave him room to breathe in the first stint, all the while managing to keep his tyres in good condition despite running so close to Kimi. I think that was quite impressive and he looked dangerous all race long.

The only negative I can think of is that he/Mercedes left him out too long in the first stint and they ended up giving Kimi room to stretch his legs without pressure from behind. If Kimi hadn't done his tyres in - which they couldn't predict - that could have effectively ended their challenge and if Kimi had gotten past Bottas that would have been it. But I'd put that down as a Mercedes strategy mistake (or perhaps risky strategy might be the better terminology), rather than a driver one.

Actually by staying out the way that he did, Hamilton basically baited Kimi into pushing his tires too hard too soon. Having had no practice with the softs, Kimi basically came out of the pits pushing like crazy to avoid the overcut. Hamilton stretched out this period of time where he was pushing on the SS tires and Kimi basically fried his new soft tires by driving hot laps for about 5-6 laps fresh out of the pits.

I think the part of the race where Kimi was behind Bottas was relatively inconsequential with regards to the tires. It did make it a lot easier for Hamilton to close out Kimi's lead but from what I saw, Kimi was never going to win the race after running so hard on those new tires. They were completely dead for like the last 15 laps of the race and his pace vanished at the end completely. I don't think he was going to be able to keep Hamilton behind. I think Ferrari should have brought at least one more set of those soft tires and tried running them before the race.

we've seen drivers pushing like crazy on new tyres before without damaging them, to be fair. I don't think Mercedes specifically chose that strategy in order to fry Kimi's tyres.
Even if Kimi had stopped pushing earlier than he did, and assuming that it was his fault that the tyres went, he was taking a second a lap out of Hamilton's lead and if the tyres hadn't given way that would have left Lewis with a mountain to climb. I'd heard it said that Mercedes were holding out against the possibility of a SC, but effectively it almost undid all of Hamilton's work in putting the pressure on Kimi earlier. Once it was apparent that Hamilton wasn't going any faster than Kimi after the stops, they probably should have brought Hamilton in.

This is all academic, of course. At the end of the day it all worked to perfection and Lewis pulled off an impressive win. I just can't help but feel that his strategists almost let him down by letting Kimi build up too much of a lead and giving him space to breathe that until then he'd been denied. Lewis was 5 seconds down the road when he rejoined and he had to put in some even faster times than Kimi had just to catch up

My feeling watching it at the time was that Mercedes saw Hamilton's improved sector times once Kimi was out of his way and decided to leave him out in the belief that his tyres were still in good condition and so he could match or even beat Kimi's pace on the softs. When Kimi then started setting even faster times they realised they had missed their chance and that their best approach then was to leave Hamilton out and rely on him passing Kimi with fresher tyres at the end. That Bottas was well placed to aid this strategy along by holding Kimi up was a bonus. I agree that they had no idea Kimi's tyres were going to fall to pieces, so they got a bit lucky in this regard. I thought at the time that Mercedes had messed up by not pitting Hamilton the lap after Kimi did as he stood a decent chance of emerging ahead, especially after Mercedes' shenanigans with their pit crew impeding Kimi's entry to his pit box.

I still believe that it was Hamilton's pace on the supersofts that forced Kimi to take too much out of his tyres early on in the stint and ultimately won him the race. Definitely one of his more impressive wins if you ask me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2018 7:26 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm
Posts: 27915
JN23 wrote:
Lojik wrote:
pokerman wrote:
We might have to hope that Red Bull can challenge Ferrari at Singapore?


Even if they do, only one of them is likely to finish.


And possibility that Ricciardo will start from the back?

Apparently he has an old engine he can still use.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: Currently 3rd

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (6)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2018 7:28 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm
Posts: 27915
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
JN23 wrote:
bonecrasher wrote:
What a steal from Hamilton and Mercedes to extend both championship leads in Monza, and this time didn’t even need rain. But there are no tracks left on the calendar that scream Mercedes. Perhaps Suzuka and COTA. Either way it’s gonna be difficult to win the championships against the faster Ferrari which has no weak track at all. Still gonna be thrilling to watch Hamilton attempt to pull it off.


Hamilton was superb all weekend, where does his drive on Sunday rank amongst his best?

Interesting to see what happens at Singapore, on the face of it after recent years it will be another 'damage limitation' but Merc and Hamilton are doing a good job of winning those recently.

We might have to hope that Red Bull can challenge Ferrari at Singapore?

Given that Monza was supposed to have been a damage limitation exercise for Mercedes, I'm not at all convinced that they will be trailing in Singapore

They have history of trailing at Singapore even when they've had the best car, unless it rains of course like last year. :)

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: Currently 3rd

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (6)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2018 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 3:53 am
Posts: 5908
Location: Michigan, USA
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
JN23 wrote:
bonecrasher wrote:
What a steal from Hamilton and Mercedes to extend both championship leads in Monza, and this time didn’t even need rain. But there are no tracks left on the calendar that scream Mercedes. Perhaps Suzuka and COTA. Either way it’s gonna be difficult to win the championships against the faster Ferrari which has no weak track at all. Still gonna be thrilling to watch Hamilton attempt to pull it off.


Hamilton was superb all weekend, where does his drive on Sunday rank amongst his best?

Interesting to see what happens at Singapore, on the face of it after recent years it will be another 'damage limitation' but Merc and Hamilton are doing a good job of winning those recently.

We might have to hope that Red Bull can challenge Ferrari at Singapore?

Given that Monza was supposed to have been a damage limitation exercise for Mercedes, I'm not at all convinced that they will be trailing in Singapore

They have history of trailing at Singapore even when they've had the best car, unless it rains of course like last year. :)

They were trailing last year as well, until the three fastest cars all smashed each other out...

_________________
PF1 PICK 10 COMPETITION (4 wins, 14 podiums): 2017: 19th| 2016: 3rd| 2015: 4th
PF1 TOP THREE TEAM CHAMPIONSHIP (No Limit Excedrin Racing): 2017: 2nd| 2015: 1st
AUTOSPORT GP PREDICTOR: 2017 United States Champion! (world #2)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2018 9:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 23910
j man wrote:
Zoue wrote:
sandman1347 wrote:
Zoue wrote:
JN23 wrote:

Hamilton was superb all weekend, where does his drive on Sunday rank amongst his best?

Interesting to see what happens at Singapore, on the face of it after recent years it will be another 'damage limitation' but Merc and Hamilton are doing a good job of winning those recently.

The more I think about it, the more I think this was a really good performance by Hamilton. He constantly harassed Kimi and never gave him room to breathe in the first stint, all the while managing to keep his tyres in good condition despite running so close to Kimi. I think that was quite impressive and he looked dangerous all race long.

The only negative I can think of is that he/Mercedes left him out too long in the first stint and they ended up giving Kimi room to stretch his legs without pressure from behind. If Kimi hadn't done his tyres in - which they couldn't predict - that could have effectively ended their challenge and if Kimi had gotten past Bottas that would have been it. But I'd put that down as a Mercedes strategy mistake (or perhaps risky strategy might be the better terminology), rather than a driver one.

Actually by staying out the way that he did, Hamilton basically baited Kimi into pushing his tires too hard too soon. Having had no practice with the softs, Kimi basically came out of the pits pushing like crazy to avoid the overcut. Hamilton stretched out this period of time where he was pushing on the SS tires and Kimi basically fried his new soft tires by driving hot laps for about 5-6 laps fresh out of the pits.

I think the part of the race where Kimi was behind Bottas was relatively inconsequential with regards to the tires. It did make it a lot easier for Hamilton to close out Kimi's lead but from what I saw, Kimi was never going to win the race after running so hard on those new tires. They were completely dead for like the last 15 laps of the race and his pace vanished at the end completely. I don't think he was going to be able to keep Hamilton behind. I think Ferrari should have brought at least one more set of those soft tires and tried running them before the race.

we've seen drivers pushing like crazy on new tyres before without damaging them, to be fair. I don't think Mercedes specifically chose that strategy in order to fry Kimi's tyres.
Even if Kimi had stopped pushing earlier than he did, and assuming that it was his fault that the tyres went, he was taking a second a lap out of Hamilton's lead and if the tyres hadn't given way that would have left Lewis with a mountain to climb. I'd heard it said that Mercedes were holding out against the possibility of a SC, but effectively it almost undid all of Hamilton's work in putting the pressure on Kimi earlier. Once it was apparent that Hamilton wasn't going any faster than Kimi after the stops, they probably should have brought Hamilton in.

This is all academic, of course. At the end of the day it all worked to perfection and Lewis pulled off an impressive win. I just can't help but feel that his strategists almost let him down by letting Kimi build up too much of a lead and giving him space to breathe that until then he'd been denied. Lewis was 5 seconds down the road when he rejoined and he had to put in some even faster times than Kimi had just to catch up

My feeling watching it at the time was that Mercedes saw Hamilton's improved sector times once Kimi was out of his way and decided to leave him out in the belief that his tyres were still in good condition and so he could match or even beat Kimi's pace on the softs. When Kimi then started setting even faster times they realised they had missed their chance and that their best approach then was to leave Hamilton out and rely on him passing Kimi with fresher tyres at the end. That Bottas was well placed to aid this strategy along by holding Kimi up was a bonus. I agree that they had no idea Kimi's tyres were going to fall to pieces, so they got a bit lucky in this regard. I thought at the time that Mercedes had messed up by not pitting Hamilton the lap after Kimi did as he stood a decent chance of emerging ahead, especially after Mercedes' shenanigans with their pit crew impeding Kimi's entry to his pit box.

I still believe that it was Hamilton's pace on the supersofts that forced Kimi to take too much out of his tyres early on in the stint and ultimately won him the race. Definitely one of his more impressive wins if you ask me.

yes, that's how I saw it, too :thumbup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 12:23 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm
Posts: 27915
Exediron wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
JN23 wrote:
Hamilton was superb all weekend, where does his drive on Sunday rank amongst his best?

Interesting to see what happens at Singapore, on the face of it after recent years it will be another 'damage limitation' but Merc and Hamilton are doing a good job of winning those recently.

We might have to hope that Red Bull can challenge Ferrari at Singapore?

Given that Monza was supposed to have been a damage limitation exercise for Mercedes, I'm not at all convinced that they will be trailing in Singapore

They have history of trailing at Singapore even when they've had the best car, unless it rains of course like last year. :)

They were trailing last year as well, until the three fastest cars all smashed each other out...

Well that also helped :)

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: Currently 3rd

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (6)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 7:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 23910
Johnson wrote:
sandman1347 wrote:
Johnson wrote:
I agree with everything in the video and its a good one, but one thing.

They could have easily got VB 3rd place by pitting him between laps 21-26. Kimi pitted on lap 21. Bottas was 1 second behind Max all of those laps and would have easily undercut him. Verstappen pitted on lap 27.

They left him out to hold up Kimi and by doing so knew they also gave VB a very good chance to get 3rd with a tyre offset. But its BS that they did everything to guarantee VB 3rd, if that was true he would have pitted laps 22-26. It was great team work, they should just tell it as it is instead of glossing over "we decided early to go long with Bottas" is BS.

You're missing the nuance of the situation. If they came out into the pit lane for Bottas during the window you're referring to, Red Bull would have sent Max's crew out into the pit lane immediately to react. They would not have given Bottas the undercut. It would have basically been exactly the same as the Hamilton/Raikkonen situation.

So why did they try it with Hamilton? They could have at least tried it. The earlier Verstappen pitted, the better it was for Bottas too as it would have meant an even larger tyre off set. Bottas was obviously quicker. If Max's tyres were 5 laps older at the end of the race Bottas may have passed him actually on track (not that it mattered in the end)

A side note to this, the WCC winners choose if they want first or last pit stop - why don't Mercedes choose the garage furthest from the entry. That way your mechanics can come out after your driver has entered the pits so can't be countered in that way.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t the pit boxes get progressively smaller the further you go down the pit lane? I’m sure I remember seeing a report stating that when McLaren first lost their position at the top table and they were saying it was going to be a bit difficult for them to shoehorn their massive operation in at some circuits


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 8:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 14181
Zoue wrote:
Johnson wrote:
sandman1347 wrote:
Johnson wrote:
I agree with everything in the video and its a good one, but one thing.

They could have easily got VB 3rd place by pitting him between laps 21-26. Kimi pitted on lap 21. Bottas was 1 second behind Max all of those laps and would have easily undercut him. Verstappen pitted on lap 27.

They left him out to hold up Kimi and by doing so knew they also gave VB a very good chance to get 3rd with a tyre offset. But its BS that they did everything to guarantee VB 3rd, if that was true he would have pitted laps 22-26. It was great team work, they should just tell it as it is instead of glossing over "we decided early to go long with Bottas" is BS.

You're missing the nuance of the situation. If they came out into the pit lane for Bottas during the window you're referring to, Red Bull would have sent Max's crew out into the pit lane immediately to react. They would not have given Bottas the undercut. It would have basically been exactly the same as the Hamilton/Raikkonen situation.

So why did they try it with Hamilton? They could have at least tried it. The earlier Verstappen pitted, the better it was for Bottas too as it would have meant an even larger tyre off set. Bottas was obviously quicker. If Max's tyres were 5 laps older at the end of the race Bottas may have passed him actually on track (not that it mattered in the end)

A side note to this, the WCC winners choose if they want first or last pit stop - why don't Mercedes choose the garage furthest from the entry. That way your mechanics can come out after your driver has entered the pits so can't be countered in that way.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t the pit boxes get progressively smaller the further you go down the pit lane? I’m sure I remember seeing a report stating that when McLaren first lost their position at the top table and they were saying it was going to be a bit difficult for them to shoehorn their massive operation in at some circuits


Not anymore. All garages are the same size these days.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 8:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 23910
mikeyg123 wrote:
Zoue wrote:
Johnson wrote:
sandman1347 wrote:
Johnson wrote:
I agree with everything in the video and its a good one, but one thing.

They could have easily got VB 3rd place by pitting him between laps 21-26. Kimi pitted on lap 21. Bottas was 1 second behind Max all of those laps and would have easily undercut him. Verstappen pitted on lap 27.

They left him out to hold up Kimi and by doing so knew they also gave VB a very good chance to get 3rd with a tyre offset. But its BS that they did everything to guarantee VB 3rd, if that was true he would have pitted laps 22-26. It was great team work, they should just tell it as it is instead of glossing over "we decided early to go long with Bottas" is BS.

You're missing the nuance of the situation. If they came out into the pit lane for Bottas during the window you're referring to, Red Bull would have sent Max's crew out into the pit lane immediately to react. They would not have given Bottas the undercut. It would have basically been exactly the same as the Hamilton/Raikkonen situation.

So why did they try it with Hamilton? They could have at least tried it. The earlier Verstappen pitted, the better it was for Bottas too as it would have meant an even larger tyre off set. Bottas was obviously quicker. If Max's tyres were 5 laps older at the end of the race Bottas may have passed him actually on track (not that it mattered in the end)

A side note to this, the WCC winners choose if they want first or last pit stop - why don't Mercedes choose the garage furthest from the entry. That way your mechanics can come out after your driver has entered the pits so can't be countered in that way.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t the pit boxes get progressively smaller the further you go down the pit lane? I’m sure I remember seeing a report stating that when McLaren first lost their position at the top table and they were saying it was going to be a bit difficult for them to shoehorn their massive operation in at some circuits


Not anymore. All garages are the same size these days.

ah ok, thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 10:02 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 4:09 pm
Posts: 4300
Location: LONDON...!
JN23 wrote:
Lojik wrote:
pokerman wrote:
We might have to hope that Red Bull can challenge Ferrari at Singapore?


Even if they do, only one of them is likely to finish.


And possibility that Ricciardo will start from the back?

He wont he will go back to the b-spec engine.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2018 5:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 4:59 pm
Posts: 508
Clarky wrote:
JN23 wrote:
Lojik wrote:
pokerman wrote:
We might have to hope that Red Bull can challenge Ferrari at Singapore?


Even if they do, only one of them is likely to finish.


And possibility that Ricciardo will start from the back?

He wont he will go back to the b-spec engine.

Think I saw somewhere it was only the clutch, so everything else is usable


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 9:33 pm
Posts: 1884
Hi guys. I'd like an opinion on something if you would?

Which Hamilton race performances would you say were particularly strong during his Mercedes stretch?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 2:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:14 am
Posts: 363
Location: Stratford
Off the top of my head with not much thought:

Malaysia 2014
Monaco 2016
Spain 2017
Germany 2018
Italy 2018


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 5:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 2:10 pm
Posts: 309
Silverstone 2013 wasn't that bad despite not finishing from where he started- an incredible qualy lap & good recovery after that rear tyre blow out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 5:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 7:55 pm
Posts: 5454
Charges from the back:
Germany 2014, Hungary 2014, Spa 2016, Germany 2018

Dominant wins from pole:
USA 2016, Barcelona 2018, Silverstone 2015-17 (definitely left some out from 2015)

Wheel to wheel fights:
Bahrain 2014, USA 2014, USA 2015, USA 2017, Italy 2018


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 7:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 8:48 pm
Posts: 2906
Location: UK
I struggle with picking out standout wins from 2014-2016 because of the immense superiority of the Mercedes. His only competition was Rosberg, and any comebacks through the field are pretty straightforward when your car is several seconds quicker than most of the others once everything's turned up. Most wins in that period were a question of controlling the pace at the front.

Germany and Italy this year were among the most impressive wins of his career. Austin was his standout race from 2017 as I think the Ferrari was the car to have that day. His win in Hungary in 2013 was worthy of note as the car was not the fastest at that time. I think Monaco 2016 gets overlooked because Ricciardo should have won it, but I think Hamilton being the only one to keep the wet tyres in shape on a drying track made his the best performance of the day. Then I'd pick out a couple of races where he chased down and passed Rosberg in a straight fight: at Monza in 2014 and in the tricky conditions in Japan the same year.

EDIT: I'll also add Brazil in 2016. Hamilton and Verstappen were supreme in the wet that day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:14 pm
Posts: 3412
j man wrote:
I struggle with picking out standout wins from 2014-2016 because of the immense superiority of the Mercedes. His only competition was Rosberg, and any comebacks through the field are pretty straightforward when your car is several seconds quicker than most of the others once everything's turned up. Most wins in that period were a question of controlling the pace at the front.


EDIT: I'll also add Brazil in 2016. Hamilton and Verstappen were supreme in the wet that day.


Suzuka 2014 was epic for that brilliant pass he executed on Rosberg and then disappearing off in the distance in crazy wet conditions.
Bahrain 2014 was a forever epic race.
How can you leave those out? :lol:
USA 2017 is a race I attended live; he dominated the entire weekend and it was obvious after FP3 no one was going to touch him there. I wouldn't' say that the Ferrari was the car to have that weekend though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:43 pm
Posts: 413
Location: UK
Hungary 2013
Bahrain 2014
Italy 2018


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 8:48 pm
Posts: 2906
Location: UK
kleefton wrote:
j man wrote:
I struggle with picking out standout wins from 2014-2016 because of the immense superiority of the Mercedes. His only competition was Rosberg, and any comebacks through the field are pretty straightforward when your car is several seconds quicker than most of the others once everything's turned up. Most wins in that period were a question of controlling the pace at the front.


EDIT: I'll also add Brazil in 2016. Hamilton and Verstappen were supreme in the wet that day.


Suzuka 2014 was epic for that brilliant pass he executed on Rosberg and then disappearing off in the distance in crazy wet conditions.
Bahrain 2014 was a forever epic race.
How can you leave those out? :lol:
USA 2017 is a race I attended live; he dominated the entire weekend and it was obvious after FP3 no one was going to touch him there. I wouldn't' say that the Ferrari was the car to have that weekend though.

I did mention Suzuka 2014... you deleted it from the quote ;)

Bahrain 2014 was fantastic to watch but was it a fantastic performance? Hamilton and Rosberg were quite evenly matched that day and I thought some of Hamilton's driving was just a touch too aggressive for battling a team mate.

USA 2017 is one of those that is hard to judge how good the car was: in Hamilton's hands it looked the fastest but in Bottas' hands it looked the third fastest. In such situations I'm inclined to believe that the truth lies somewhere in between.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 5:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 11:31 am
Posts: 1731
Bahrain 2014 and Spa "because I lifted" 2017 for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 5:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 11:31 am
Posts: 1731
And of course Italy 2018


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 7:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 7:55 pm
Posts: 5454
j man wrote:
kleefton wrote:
j man wrote:
I struggle with picking out standout wins from 2014-2016 because of the immense superiority of the Mercedes. His only competition was Rosberg, and any comebacks through the field are pretty straightforward when your car is several seconds quicker than most of the others once everything's turned up. Most wins in that period were a question of controlling the pace at the front.


EDIT: I'll also add Brazil in 2016. Hamilton and Verstappen were supreme in the wet that day.


Suzuka 2014 was epic for that brilliant pass he executed on Rosberg and then disappearing off in the distance in crazy wet conditions.
Bahrain 2014 was a forever epic race.
How can you leave those out? :lol:
USA 2017 is a race I attended live; he dominated the entire weekend and it was obvious after FP3 no one was going to touch him there. I wouldn't' say that the Ferrari was the car to have that weekend though.

I did mention Suzuka 2014... you deleted it from the quote ;)

Bahrain 2014 was fantastic to watch but was it a fantastic performance? Hamilton and Rosberg were quite evenly matched that day and I thought some of Hamilton's driving was just a touch too aggressive for battling a team mate.

USA 2017 is one of those that is hard to judge how good the car was: in Hamilton's hands it looked the fastest but in Bottas' hands it looked the third fastest. In such situations I'm inclined to believe that the truth lies somewhere in between.

Not even at all actually. Hamilton had a ten second lead erased by the safety car and Rosberg came out behind him on fresh softs while Hamilton was on mediums. For Lewis to win that fight with such a handicap was impressive (and it was just a ferocious battle - which you don't see too much of in F1).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 7:12 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 4:09 pm
Posts: 4300
Location: LONDON...!
Quote:
@WillDale956
LewisHamilton has now claimed as many #F1 wins from 2014-2018 as @schumacher did during his peak Ferrari title-winning years of 2000-2004: 48 wins.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 4:12 pm
Posts: 6381
Location: Nebraska, USA
Clarky wrote:
Quote:
@WillDale956
LewisHamilton has now claimed as many #F1 wins from 2014-2018 as @schumacher did during his peak Ferrari title-winning years of 2000-2004: 48 wins.


There are more races per season.

_________________
Forza Ferrari
WCCs = 16
WDCs = 15


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 7:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 7:55 pm
Posts: 5454
Blake wrote:
Clarky wrote:
Quote:
@WillDale956
LewisHamilton has now claimed as many #F1 wins from 2014-2018 as @schumacher did during his peak Ferrari title-winning years of 2000-2004: 48 wins.


There are more races per season.

There are also 2 years with a defacto #2 teammate vs all 5 for Michael with a 100% #2 teammate...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 7:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:14 am
Posts: 363
Location: Stratford
Blake wrote:
Clarky wrote:
Quote:
@WillDale956
LewisHamilton has now claimed as many #F1 wins from 2014-2018 as @schumacher did during his peak Ferrari title-winning years of 2000-2004: 48 wins.


There are more races per season.


Schumacher 56% vs Hamilton 51%


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 3:53 am
Posts: 5908
Location: Michigan, USA
How do Hamilton fans feel about that result? I'm curious, because I have the feeling that throughout Lewis' career, his fans have been quite vocal about how he doesn't need #1 status and his rivals do. Now that Lewis is clearly being given all the benefits of a Schumacher-like system of driver preference, how many of his fans still feel the same way? Are his stats going forward now tainted like I've seen Vettel's or Schumacher's called?

_________________
PF1 PICK 10 COMPETITION (4 wins, 14 podiums): 2017: 19th| 2016: 3rd| 2015: 4th
PF1 TOP THREE TEAM CHAMPIONSHIP (No Limit Excedrin Racing): 2017: 2nd| 2015: 1st
AUTOSPORT GP PREDICTOR: 2017 United States Champion! (world #2)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 8:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 14181
Exediron wrote:
How do Hamilton fans feel about that result? I'm curious, because I have the feeling that throughout Lewis' career, his fans have been quite vocal about how he doesn't need #1 status and his rivals do. Now that Lewis is clearly being given all the benefits of a Schumacher-like system of driver preference, how many of his fans still feel the same way? Are his stats going forward now tainted like I've seen Vettel's or Schumacher's called?


I'm not a Hamilton fan particularly but I think he's in a different position to Schumacher. In Scumacher's team his team mate stated the season as a number 2 with no chance of equal treatment. They would've been told to move over in race 1. I don't think it's anything other than a sensible decision to move Bottas over in the circumstance that today threw up. I've never really been against team orders to be honest.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 8:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 7:55 pm
Posts: 5454
Exediron wrote:
How do Hamilton fans feel about that result? I'm curious, because I have the feeling that throughout Lewis' career, his fans have been quite vocal about how he doesn't need #1 status and his rivals do. Now that Lewis is clearly being given all the benefits of a Schumacher-like system of driver preference, how many of his fans still feel the same way? Are his stats going forward now tainted like I've seen Vettel's or Schumacher's called?

I think it's a bit imbalanced to even ask that question. Through his whole career this is the first time Lewis has won a race like this. Michael had #1 status literally his entire career before retiring in 2006. One race doesn't make things even.

I will say though that as someone who has rooted for Hamilton, this is not something I am happy to see. It's not in his hands. The decision came from the pit wall but it's ugly none the less. What's worse, it was probably completely unnecessary. I don't think he'll need those 7 points. It took 70 wins for him to have a "tainted" one but I do think this is a clear example of benefiting from the kind or team choreography that he did not experience throughout most of his career. Not a welcome change from the point of view of a supporter and if it persists, he does lose footing on this particular topic.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 8:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 3:53 am
Posts: 5908
Location: Michigan, USA
mikeyg123 wrote:
I don't think it's anything other than a sensible decision to move Bottas over in the circumstance that today threw up. I've never really been against team orders to be honest.

I'm not against team orders either, but I disagree with you on the sensible part. I personally don't see this as much different from ordering Barichello aside in Austria: Hamilton has a massive WDC lead at this point, and I don't personally see any way outside a mechanical failure that he's losing the title from here. If the battle was close, I would absolutely see the point.

Basically, team orders to achieve a better result for the team are fine by me. But I see this as team orders without any need, and particularly harsh since Bottas was looking for his first win of the season. Additionally, I'm a little bothered that they almost certainly lied about the reason - if it was really to protect Hamilton's tyres, they would have had him let Bottas back through. They could at least have had the guts to admit why they were doing it.

At the end of the day if Lewis wins the WDC by 7 points or less, they will have made a good call. But I expect him to win by more like 60-70 points, and it won't have made any difference aside from humiliating their #2 driver.

_________________
PF1 PICK 10 COMPETITION (4 wins, 14 podiums): 2017: 19th| 2016: 3rd| 2015: 4th
PF1 TOP THREE TEAM CHAMPIONSHIP (No Limit Excedrin Racing): 2017: 2nd| 2015: 1st
AUTOSPORT GP PREDICTOR: 2017 United States Champion! (world #2)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 3:53 am
Posts: 5908
Location: Michigan, USA
sandman1347 wrote:
I will say though that as someone who has rooted for Hamilton, this is not something I am happy to see. It's not in his hands. The decision came from the pit wall but it's ugly none the less. What's worse, it was probably completely unnecessary. I don't think he'll need those 7 points. It took 70 wins for him to have a "tainted" one but I do think this is a clear example of benefiting from the kind or team choreography that he did not experience throughout most of his career. Not a welcome change from the point of view of a supporter and if it persists, he does lose footing on this particular topic.

Fair enough. I can respect any Hamilton fan who sticks to his guns on the topic. :thumbup:

I would have liked to see Hamilton defy the pit wall and hand the place back on the last lap. For that, I would have respected him a lot, and it would have given him a clear moral high ground over drivers like Vettel.

_________________
PF1 PICK 10 COMPETITION (4 wins, 14 podiums): 2017: 19th| 2016: 3rd| 2015: 4th
PF1 TOP THREE TEAM CHAMPIONSHIP (No Limit Excedrin Racing): 2017: 2nd| 2015: 1st
AUTOSPORT GP PREDICTOR: 2017 United States Champion! (world #2)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 8:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:14 am
Posts: 363
Location: Stratford
sandman1347 wrote:
Exediron wrote:
How do Hamilton fans feel about that result? I'm curious, because I have the feeling that throughout Lewis' career, his fans have been quite vocal about how he doesn't need #1 status and his rivals do. Now that Lewis is clearly being given all the benefits of a Schumacher-like system of driver preference, how many of his fans still feel the same way? Are his stats going forward now tainted like I've seen Vettel's or Schumacher's called?

I think it's a bit imbalanced to even ask that question. Through his whole career this is the first time Lewis has won a race like this. Michael had #1 status literally his entire career before retiring in 2006. One race doesn't make things even.

I will say though that as someone who has rooted for Hamilton, this is not something I am happy to see. It's not in his hands. The decision came from the pit wall but it's ugly none the less. What's worse, it was probably completely unnecessary. I don't think he'll need those 7 points. It took 70 wins for him to have a "tainted" one but I do think this is a clear example of benefiting from the kind or team choreography that he did not experience throughout most of his career. Not a welcome change from the point of view of a supporter and if it persists, he does lose footing on this particular topic.


I wonder if Merc will think twice about doing the same if they're in the same position in Japan after some of the negative response from today?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 9:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 7:55 pm
Posts: 5454
JN23 wrote:
sandman1347 wrote:
Exediron wrote:
How do Hamilton fans feel about that result? I'm curious, because I have the feeling that throughout Lewis' career, his fans have been quite vocal about how he doesn't need #1 status and his rivals do. Now that Lewis is clearly being given all the benefits of a Schumacher-like system of driver preference, how many of his fans still feel the same way? Are his stats going forward now tainted like I've seen Vettel's or Schumacher's called?

I think it's a bit imbalanced to even ask that question. Through his whole career this is the first time Lewis has won a race like this. Michael had #1 status literally his entire career before retiring in 2006. One race doesn't make things even.

I will say though that as someone who has rooted for Hamilton, this is not something I am happy to see. It's not in his hands. The decision came from the pit wall but it's ugly none the less. What's worse, it was probably completely unnecessary. I don't think he'll need those 7 points. It took 70 wins for him to have a "tainted" one but I do think this is a clear example of benefiting from the kind or team choreography that he did not experience throughout most of his career. Not a welcome change from the point of view of a supporter and if it persists, he does lose footing on this particular topic.


I wonder if Merc will think twice about doing the same if they're in the same position in Japan after some of the negative response from today?

They're unlikely to find themselves in that position in Japan. Russia is really a specialty for Bottas but he wasn't on Hamilton's pace in Japan last year. Maybe they'll gift Bottas a win if they're running 1-2 in Abu Dhabi with the title already decided?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 9:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 7:55 pm
Posts: 5454
Exediron wrote:
sandman1347 wrote:
I will say though that as someone who has rooted for Hamilton, this is not something I am happy to see. It's not in his hands. The decision came from the pit wall but it's ugly none the less. What's worse, it was probably completely unnecessary. I don't think he'll need those 7 points. It took 70 wins for him to have a "tainted" one but I do think this is a clear example of benefiting from the kind or team choreography that he did not experience throughout most of his career. Not a welcome change from the point of view of a supporter and if it persists, he does lose footing on this particular topic.

Fair enough. I can respect any Hamilton fan who sticks to his guns on the topic. :thumbup:

I would have liked to see Hamilton defy the pit wall and hand the place back on the last lap. For that, I would have respected him a lot, and it would have given him a clear moral high ground over drivers like Vettel.

That would have been epic but when have you ever seen any racing driver defy team orders that benefit them? I literally cannot think of a single example. I don't think Michael was thrilled about winning the way he did in Austria 2002 and I think the drivers don't like to have wins that come this way but none of them would give it back against orders.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 9:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:14 am
Posts: 363
Location: Stratford
sandman1347 wrote:
JN23 wrote:
sandman1347 wrote:
Exediron wrote:
How do Hamilton fans feel about that result? I'm curious, because I have the feeling that throughout Lewis' career, his fans have been quite vocal about how he doesn't need #1 status and his rivals do. Now that Lewis is clearly being given all the benefits of a Schumacher-like system of driver preference, how many of his fans still feel the same way? Are his stats going forward now tainted like I've seen Vettel's or Schumacher's called?

I think it's a bit imbalanced to even ask that question. Through his whole career this is the first time Lewis has won a race like this. Michael had #1 status literally his entire career before retiring in 2006. One race doesn't make things even.

I will say though that as someone who has rooted for Hamilton, this is not something I am happy to see. It's not in his hands. The decision came from the pit wall but it's ugly none the less. What's worse, it was probably completely unnecessary. I don't think he'll need those 7 points. It took 70 wins for him to have a "tainted" one but I do think this is a clear example of benefiting from the kind or team choreography that he did not experience throughout most of his career. Not a welcome change from the point of view of a supporter and if it persists, he does lose footing on this particular topic.


I wonder if Merc will think twice about doing the same if they're in the same position in Japan after some of the negative response from today?

They're unlikely to find themselves in that position in Japan. Russia is really a specialty for Bottas but he wasn't on Hamilton's pace in Japan last year. Maybe they'll gift Bottas a win if they're running 1-2 in Abu Dhabi with the title already decided?


It was a hypothetical situation, but I agree yeah Merc are unlikely to find themselves in that situation of Bottas being ahead.

Yeah I can see them giving Bottas a win if Hamilton wraps it up before the last race. Wonder whether Bottas would see that as them pitying him or whether he'd see as payback for today.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 9:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 14181
Exediron wrote:
mikeyg123 wrote:
I don't think it's anything other than a sensible decision to move Bottas over in the circumstance that today threw up. I've never really been against team orders to be honest.

I'm not against team orders either, but I disagree with you on the sensible part. I personally don't see this as much different from ordering Barichello aside in Austria: Hamilton has a massive WDC lead at this point, and I don't personally see any way outside a mechanical failure that he's losing the title from here. If the battle was close, I would absolutely see the point.

Basically, team orders to achieve a better result for the team are fine by me. But I see this as team orders without any need, and particularly harsh since Bottas was looking for his first win of the season. Additionally, I'm a little bothered that they almost certainly lied about the reason - if it was really to protect Hamilton's tyres, they would have had him let Bottas back through. They could at least have had the guts to admit why they were doing it.

At the end of the day if Lewis wins the WDC by 7 points or less, they will have made a good call. But I expect him to win by more like 60-70 points, and it won't have made any difference aside from humiliating their #2 driver.


Austria was race 6 and it was already clear nobody would challenge Schumacher. He had double the points of anybody else. I don't think the points gap is that massive. Lewis lost a very similar advantage in the final 2 races of 2007. You say "I don't personally see any way outside a mechanical failure that he's losing the title from here" like that is almost an impossibility but he could easily have a failure in the final few races.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2015 8:05 pm
Posts: 42
Location: Gateshead
Ferrari would have done exactly the same today if roles were reversed.
Hamilton finally gets some clear assistance from a team-mate to move closer to winning the WDC and the internet goes into meltdown

_________________
25/05/2005


"It’s lights out and away we go”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 9:33 pm
Posts: 1884
Lewis' racing after the pitstop was spectacular and has been lost in the furore of Merc team orders. His inspired push to get a move done which likely had to be done early in the life of the tyres essentially turned a likely P3 into a P1. If Vettel holds off Hamilton then Bottas probably wins the race.

This moment of hellbent racing was vital in securing the win.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 10:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 7:55 pm
Posts: 5454
Invade wrote:
Lewis' racing after the pitstop was spectacular and has been lost in the furore of Merc team orders. His inspired push to get a move done which likely had to be done early in the life of the tyres essentially turned a likely P3 into a P1. If Vettel holds off Hamilton then Bottas probably wins the race.

This moment of hellbent racing was vital in securing the win.

Best part of the race and yes, it's a shame that it will be completely overshadowed.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: froze, jujuandhuhu, pokerman, TheDamus and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group