planetf1.com

Nah, they've just ensured that only rich drivers with some talent get a chance. They're effectively closing the door on drivers who struggle with funding

How are drivers struggling with funding going to get noticed by the F1 team's in the first place, it's a bit like the chicken and the egg?

To begin with you have to have the funding to be racing in single seaters

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place
2017: 9th Place
2018: Currently 3rd

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (6)

That wouldn't really mean much of a difference with what we see today, except that this would have stopped Max from getting a seat. Most compete at F3 and GP2/FR3.5 level, so almost anyone would qualify for an SL.

_________________
Go Vandoorne - Verstappen - Vettel!

I agree you need some funding, but as has been pointed out the FIA approved route like GP2 is hideously expensive and FR 3.5 was a cheaper option. By closing the door to that path the FIA has effectively excluded less well-funded drivers. The Chiltons of this world will still get their chance (sorry to pick on Max, he's just the most obvious example). It will be harder for less financially endowed drivers to get noticed in the first place.

All it is is a money making scheme for the FIA. It doesn't help F1 in the slightest and it doesn't address the issues raised above. But it can ensure that gifted individuals with less backing may miss out

Max Chilton only had 20 points, as you need 40 points, these points can be got by competing in F3, GP3 and FR3.5 without even having to compete in GP2.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place
2017: 9th Place
2018: Currently 3rd

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (6)

It doesn't matter. The point is he'll get the opportunity that others won't, whereas before they stood more of a chance

He would probably have gotten the points in 2013 anyway if he hadn't made the step to F1. He had finished fourth in 2012 and had beaten Calado and Leimer, who won the series in 2013. At least a podium in the final rankings was very much on the table, and even if he didn't improve on his fourth position he would have had the required 40 points.

_________________
Go Vandoorne - Verstappen - Vettel!

I don't understand this logic why does this give Chilton more of a chance?

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place
2017: 9th Place
2018: Currently 3rd

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (6)

That's still not guaranteed and at least Chilton would have had to have got the necessary results to get into F1 rather than just merely buying his way

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place
2017: 9th Place
2018: Currently 3rd

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (6)

GP2 is very expensive. Those without big budgets will have a harder time since they are virtually required to pass through GP2 and compete for seats with those that bring a lot of cash.

_________________
Go Vandoorne - Verstappen - Vettel!

Of course it's not guaranteed but if he can do it once, logic tells me he can do it twice especially if those at the top leave the series.

The point is that this rule will not stop the Chiltons and others like him to join F1.

_________________
Go Vandoorne - Verstappen - Vettel!

Why do you have to pass through GP2 to get into F1 when you can get the necessary points for a F1 super license in FR3.5, GP3 and European F3?

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place
2017: 9th Place
2018: Currently 3rd

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (6)

To maximize your chances of course. I'm not going to calculate all possibilities but bear in mind that most don't become rookie champs so they spend more than one year in a series. GP2 just is a better bet if you have the money.

_________________
Go Vandoorne - Verstappen - Vettel!

There seems to be certain anti GP2 vibe to all of this, the top drivers move up in the other classes as well making that bit easier the year after for the drivers to come, but in fact what happens moreso is that drivers actually stick around in GP2 which makes it that bit harder to succeed.

Carlos Sainz won the FR3.5 title after the likes of Magnussen, Vandoorne and de la Costa moved on obtaining 30 points on his license. I doubt that Sainz would have even finished top 6 in GP2, 6th place would give him 8 points, if the likes of Chilton can get 40 points in GP2 then he has done well given the competition.

I don't understand the concept that all the real talent in the junior series lies below GP2 and GP2 itself prevents drivers from getting into F1 despite the fact they can still get the necessary points and actually bypass GP2.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place
2017: 9th Place
2018: Currently 3rd

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (6)

Guys, this is the MAX VERSTAPPEN thread. There is a seperate thread for the general super licence discussions.

_________________

AlienTurnedHuman wrote:

Eurytus probably thought he was God. At least until he was banned. Which means if he was God, it makes me very scared of PF1-Mod.

Please report forum problems to us, via PM/Feedback Thread. Screenshots will also help.

Hats down to the youngest lad, he drives so maturely. He surely is the future of F1.

_________________
The end is near

Max explaining to Michael how one of his passing moves could have been executed better.

_________________
Champions are made from something they have deep inside of them - a desire, a dream, a vision. They have last-minute stamina, they have to be a little faster, they have the skill & the will but the will must be stronger than the skill. Muhammad Ali

http://www.crash.net/f1/news/217679/1/v ... ident.html

Speaking ahead of this weekend's Bahrain Grand Prix and asked if he felt his performance in Shanghai had “put him on the Formula 1 map”, he replied: “Well, first of all, I was really enjoying my race. We didn't have a great qualifying, but still I was very confident that we could do a good race because I think the car and it's race pace is really strong, especially high speed. “I had some good overtakes, I was really enjoying that. It's also every race I'm getting more and more confident in the car. Especially in the first two races you don't want to take too many risks and I decided in China it was time to do some overtakes and take some more risks.”

_________________
Kimi: "Come on, get the McLaren out of the way!”

Is that Jan Lammers in white jacket, looking behind his shoulder?

_________________
The end is near

Looks like it, although I think it's Huub Rothengatter, Jos Verstappen's manager at the time. Also a former Formula 1 driver, by the way.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition: 10th (2014); 8th (2015)

PF1 Pick 3 Competition: 1st (2014); 1st (2015)

Yes, it's definitively Huub Rothengatter. I remember the time when he drove for Spirit, Osella and Zakspeed. back in 80's. He was so close to pints at times, but he had really no chance as all those cars were so awful.

_________________
The end is near

Thread has been inactive for a good while, so I thought to bring it back up.
Most of the season has passed and Max has done way more than I would have expected. I saw the potential and talent last year, but I thought he was brought into F1 a bit too soon and, faced with a steep learning curve, would have an erratic debut season with here and there something good to write about.

He has been better though. He has made a few errors, that is true, but overall he's driven very well, has definitely shown flashes of brilliance and has had a number of great drives up until now.
There was a lot of hype surrounding him, there was enormous pressure, but that doesn't seem to have affected him at all and he is showing to be the real deal.

Go Max. I'm a fan.

_________________
Go Vandoorne - Verstappen - Vettel!

I'm surprised at how few responses this thread has.

I said back in August that he is probably the best driver on the grid already

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=14436

Everything that has happened since then has only strengthened my stance.

I fully accept that Verstappen looks like an almost inevitable future champion. I would just urge a bit of caution to those saying he is already the best.

He is an extraordinary natural talent, but he hasn't had to do it under real pressure yet. He has been out of the title hunt and able to just go for it. He still makes some major errors and there will be times when his aggression costs him.

I think it would be fair to say that he could be the best.

I think you have to earn that type of label. You don't just have it given to you based on someone's opinion. People who would call this kid the best on the grid basically expose themselves at this point. And I am a person who has long spoken about the amazing potential Max has but potential does not make you the best. Delivering is what makes you the best. Not possibilities; reality.

I'm happy to say that on form Verstappen has been the second best (even over Vettel or Alonso) for the last several races. That's a nice patch of form which he's extended for a good little while but much more is required to put him at the top. We should keep a close eye on if this form continues though as he's the only one who has really sniffed Hamilton's form since the summer break, though still slightly behind in my estimation.

'Could be" is the key part of that statement. The way hype builds around drivers is incredible and often fickle. Daniel Ricciardo was being branded the best driver on the grid by many in 2014. Now in the wake of Verstappen, the honey badger is talked about like he's a busted flush.

In fact many had him as the driver of the year for 2014 AND 2016, so you'd think over the past 4-5 years he's been the best driver in F1 and I don't really think this is the case at all. It seems people go gaga over drivers who appear to be outperforming in machinery that doesn't head the field. Until Ricciardo can contend for the WDC I'll reserve ultimate judgment.

I think we need to see him under the pressure of a title challenge before labelling him as the best driver on the grid.

He's clearly a massive talent. But he's not had a great deal to lose this year.

_________________
Top Three Team Champions 2017 (With Jezza13)
Group Pick 'Em 2016 Champion

I was a big Senna fan and he did great things in the Lotus but I never put him forward as being the best driver on the grid until he got tested by the best, that being Prost.

3 race wins and some think he's the best driver on the grid, let's see him go up against the best first.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place
2017: 9th Place
2018: Currently 3rd

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (6)

In hindsight, however, do you then judge Senna to have already been the best driver on the grid before matching up directly with Prost in light of the new information?

Exaxtly. People went bonkers for Ricciardo for outscoring Vettel in 2014. But as impressive as that was, it does need to be put in some context.

Vettel was clearly less motivated that season as it was pretty clear from the off that the Mercs were going tonrun away with it.

Ricciardo was in the best car he'd ever driven, Vettel was in the second worst F1 car he had ever driven. I think it would be a lot closer now if both were in Ferrari's for example.

After the evidence presented itself then yes but not before, the best driver he had beat was Elio de Angelis after all, I had respect for the Champions of the sport.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place
2017: 9th Place
2018: Currently 3rd

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (6)

I sort of agree with this post - but I think that it's been pretty even for these team mates - Daniel a bit cleaner - Max taking more risks (and generally getting away with them) and qualifying soooo close (generally within a tenth). Max has had the better starts and some set up gains - the latter took until the pitstop to fix - but that's inevitable and arguably could be pretty even - it just looks worse for Dan when in the wet.

The fact is that in Austin - Dan would have got a podium. In Mexico - at 7th after 5 laps and right behind Kimi R - no guarantee he'd have been able to overtake KR but definitely a podium potential and if he'd taken KR - perhaps even 2nd (I totally accept that accidents/incidents aside, Max would still have won) - but 16th to podium - versus 2nd to podium (with first and third taken out) would arguably have been the drive of the day.

We'll never know - but Max has gone out in races where he was 'normally' not going to score massive points - at best third - whereas Dan has lost multiple podiums that would have decreased Max's points and also had issues at Singapore - where he may have finished on the podium, but could have won without the oil pressure issue.

So I think the drivers on points are close to even now to where they would have been with reliability (perhaps Max a little higher being fair) - but I still think Dan has had the better race craft. How easy would it have been for Vettel to have punctured Verstappen's tyres like he did LH's? It was more racy and much more probable than for the Vettel /LH incident - but centimetres and luck make such a difference

As far as I know, Max' DNF were in Bahrain, Spain, Canada, Baku, Austria, Belgium and Singapore whereas Daniel's were Australia, Russia, Hungary, USA and Mexico.

We can tell from both lists are that if Daniel would have finished in front only in Hungary and Austin (he started 2 laps down in OZ, was overtaken in lap 1 by Max in Sotchi, and started from the back in Mexico).
Max would have finished higher than Daniel in several occasions too, in Canada, Baku and Singapore given his pace in wet conditions (Spain is obviously impossible to determine, as well as Bahrain given his undercut, he missed his start in Austria and realistically would not have beat Daniel, and in Spa they were too close to call).

So they are quite even on the matter of lost points due to DNFs. Moreover, that bold sentence in your post is wrong. They may be somewhat even on relative point losses, but that doesn't change the fact that Max would have almost certainly won Baku, and (given his pace all weekend and Ricciardo's result with that oil issue) would have a good shot for the win in Singapore.

_________________
« Violent delights have violent ends »

BIB - Really? Had he kept going he would have won Baku and certainly podium, possibly victory in Singapore. I don't think Ricciardo has lost any victories because of retirements. Maybe Hungary was possible?

I agree that he does need to prove himself in a title fight, but it's not like he's had an opportunity at a WDC before and blew it. He just hasn't been tested yet.

His raw speed is immense. Ricciardo is no slough, but Max has made him look second class whenever his car actually works, in both qualifying and in the race. His starts are usually very good, his racecraft is incredible, his tyre and race management is excellent, he's a master in the rain, and contrary to popular belief, he very rarely makes any mistakes.

I'm actually confident that he's already the best driver on the grid. I called it back in August and nobody agreed. Now a few months later, opinions are starting to swing. I'll bump this thread again in 2018 with a big "told you so".

I was stunned by his driving last year in Brazil. Since then, I've been somewhat frustrated to read so many negative comments about his driving, somewhat unjustified in my opinion. If both Redbull and Renault keep progressing like they are actually doing, Verstappen's WDC title fight is just around the corner.

_________________
« Violent delights have violent ends »